Case study ... Fundedroll (short)

2.8 to 3.9 ... starting from a public "this is a scam" review.

TrustScore ... before / after

Before 2.8 Red zone After ... within weeks 3.9 Green zone

TrustScore ... flat, then a steep jump

Green 3.8+ Yellow Red 3.0 3.5 4.0 Start Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 3.9

Star distribution ... the flip

Before 80% 1-star New reviews 100% 5-star
5 → 9 Reviews collected Up 200%
89% Organic Not from mass invites
100% Five-star on new reviews

The summary

Fundedroll's profile was small and brutal: 5 reviews, 80% one-star, with a top review flatly calling the firm a scam over a rejected $4,000 payout. That kind of review, sitting alone at the top of a thin profile, does outsized damage ... there's nothing to outweigh it.

We went to work on the profile and, within weeks, TrustScore moved to 3.9. The new reviews collected were 100% five-star, and 89% of them came in organically ... not from mass invites. Small profiles can move fast once the loudest bad-faith review stops being the only story on the page.

← Back to all case studies

Source ... public profile and client dashboard

Fundedroll public Trustpilot profile before the engagement: TrustScore 2.8 average across 5 reviews, 80 percent one-star
Fundedroll public Trustpilot profile before we started: 2.8, 5 reviews, 80% one-star.
Fundedroll Trustpilot Business dashboard, 28-day overview: 9 reviews collected up 200 percent, zero invitations delivered, current TrustScore 3.9, chart jumping from 2.8
Fundedroll Trustpilot Business dashboard, 28-day overview, after: 3.9. Account details cropped out.

Find out what your score is actually costing you.

30 minutes. We'll look at your profile and tell you exactly what's removable and what a realistic 90-day path to green looks like.